The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is often scrutinized for various reasons, including the perception that it serves as an extension of neocolonialism. This view is rooted in several factors: Influence of Former Colonial Powers: Former colonial powers, particularly France and the UK, continue to have significant economic, political, and military influence in West Africa. Some critics argue that ECOWAS facilitates the interests of these foreign powers rather than prioritizing the needs of its member states. Economic Dependence: Many West African countries remain economically dependent on their former colonizers. ECOWAS, in promoting regional integration and economic policies, might inadvertently reinforce patterns of dependency, benefiting multinational corporations and foreign investors more than local economies. Military Interventions: ECOWAS has undertaken several military interventions in its member states, often with the support or approval of Western powers. Critics argue that these interventions sometimes align more with the strategic interests of foreign countries rather than genuine humanitarian or stabilization efforts. Policy Influence: The policies and frameworks adopted by ECOWAS can sometimes reflect the priorities and preferences of international financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank, which are often seen as instruments of Western economic dominance.Continue Reading

Over the past six months, there have been several debates on the issue of the tripartite mandate and outcome. There are those who believe the tripartite committee has a constitutional mandate that allowed them to force the Electoral Commission of Sierra Leone (ECSL) to release the disaggregated results of the 2023 elections, which the opposition All Peoples Congress (APC) said it was rigged.Continue Reading